Electronic diplomacy: A study of the nature, requirements, and implications

  • Dana Ali Salih Barznji College Of Political Science, University of Sulaymaniyah, Sulaymaniyah, Kurdistan Region, Iraq

Abstract

This research treats a new and contemporary subject, i.e. e-diplomacy. Diplomacy has been transformed as a tool of foreign policy and a new pattern of diplomatic practice has emerged through the establishment of virtual embassies and websites of foreign ministries and diplomatic institutions, and also through the large presence of diplomats on social network websites. Additionally, this has been utilized in diplomatic administration and public diplomacy to achieve diplomatic goals. This research focuses on the concept of e-diplomacy and highlights its main characteristics and opportunities it offers to international units. It also focuses on the most important necessities and implications of using e-diplomacy, pros and cons to challenges and risks. With the opportunities offered by such diplomacy to international units in the exercise of their external relations, there are many requirements for such diplomacy. The research has proved its hypothesis which is that the diplomacy of international units cannot be successful if they fail or neglect to provide the essential requirements for e-diplomacy. They really need to use this diplomacy if they want their diplomacy to succeed and develop or if they are to respond to developments in diplomacy, communication technology, and information. Ignoring this will expose them to isolation from the international community, because the role of international relations, now in the official and popular spheres, depends largely on e-diplomacy, especially public diplomacy. It formulates faster communication channels and more efficient than traditional channels and can reach a wider audience, as well as administrative, structural, and informational capabilities it provides.

References

- ملاحظة: تم التأكد من توفر المصادر المأخوذة من الإنترنت في هذا البحث بتأريخ (25/01/2019)، ولذلك لا نكرّر كتابة تأريخ استرجاع هذه المصادر من الإنترنت.
أولا/ العربية والمعرَّبة:
اتفاقية فيننا للعلاقات الدبلوماسية لعام (1961).
أنوزلا. علي. الدبلوماسية الرقمية، مقال نشره موقع الجزيرة على الرابط التالي: https://blogs.aljazeera.net/blogs/2017/3/8/الدبلوماسية-الرقمية
بيجمان. جيفري. (2014). الدبلوماسية المعاصرة، ترجمة: د. محمد صفوت حسن، دار الفجر للنشر والتوزيع، مصر. القاهرة.
دياب. وليد خلف الله محمد. (10 مايو، 2016). أثر الدبلوماسية الرقمية في تحسين صورة الدول، مجلة علاقات، بيروت-لبنان، 10. 31-37.
الرويتع. خالد بن إبراهيم. (2013)، الدبلوماسية العامة الرقمية والسياسة الخارجية، الشرق الأوسط. العدد (12785)، متوفر على الرابط التالي: https://aawsat.com/home/article/11373
سيراكوسا. جوزيف إم. (2015). الدبلوماسية: مقدمة قصيرة جداً. ترجمة: كوثر محمود محمد. مؤسسة هنداوي للتعليم والثقافة، مصر. القاهرة.
عبد الحسين. ياسر. دبلوماسيّة الموجة الرابعة، مقال منشور في موقع "الأخبار" على الرابط التالي: https://al-akhbar.com/Opinion/9111
عبدالسميع. قاسمي. ماذا تعرف عن الدبلوماسية الرقمية؟، مقال منشور على الإنترنت على الرابط التالي: http://www.noonpost.com/content/21516
الفراوي. نزار. (2016). الثقافة والقوة الناعمة: حروب الأفكار في السياسة الخارجية، مركز برق للأبحاث ودراسة السياسات، دراسة منشورة متوفرة على الرابط التالي:https://bit.ly/2se4A2j
عبد الصادق. عادل. الدبلوماسية الإلكترونية والمدخل الجديد لإدارة السياسة الخارجية، دوريات - مفاهيم استراتيجية، مقال منشور في موقع المركز العربي لأبحاث الفضاء الإلكتروني، على الرابط التالي: http://accronline.com/article_detail.aspx?id=28976
عبد العال. وائل (إعداد). (2018). الدبلوماسية الرقمية ومكانتها في السياسة الخارجية الفلسطينية، سلسلة أبحاث وسياسات الإعلام-مركز تطوير الإعلام-جامعة بيرزيت، فلسطين.
العجرمي. محمود عبد ربه. (2011) الدبلوماسية: النظرية والممارسة. على الرابط التالي: http://cutt.us/Awf8P

ثانياً/ الكوردية:
بةرزنجي. دانا عةلي سالَح. (2017). دةروازةيةك بؤ ثةيوةنديية دبلؤماسي و كونسولَيية هاوضةرخةكان. سةنتةري زةهاوي بؤ ليَكؤلَينةوةي فيكريي. سليَماني. هةريَمي كوردستان. عيَراق.

ثالثاً/ الإنجليزية:
Adesina. Olubukola S. (2016). Foreign Policy in an Era of Digital Diplomacy. AJPSSI. University of Ibadan. Nigeria. Vol 19. No3.169-189.On: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/310796852_Foreign_policy_in_an_era_of_digital_diplomacy
Ayhan. Kadir Jun. (2018). The Boundaries of Public Diplomacy and Non-State Actors: A Taxonomy of Perspectives. International Studies Perspectives. International Studies Perspectives· 1-33 on: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326056416_Who_are_publics_in_public_diplomacy_Proposing_a_taxonomy_of_foreign_publics_as_an_intersection_between_symbolic_environment_and_behavioral_experiences
Berridge. G. R. & James. Alan. (2003). A Dictionary of Diplomacy. PALGRAVE MACMILLAN. New York.
Bjola. Corneliu. (2018-A). Digital Diplomacy Myths. Published on USC Center on Public Diplomacy. on: https://www.uscpublicdiplomacy.org/blog/digital-diplomacy-myths
Bjola. Corneliu. (2018-B. November 11). Trends and Counter-Trends in Digital Diplomacy. in: Volker Stanzel (Ed.). New Realities in Foreign Affairs: Diplomacy in the 21st Century. SWP Research Paper. Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik: German Institute for International and Security Affairs. Berlin-Germany. on: https://www.swp-berlin.org/fileadmin/contents/products/research_papers/2018RP11_sze.pdf
Bollier. David. (2003). The Rise of Netpolitic: How the Internet Is Changing International Politics and Diplomacy A Report of the Eleventh Annual Aspen Institute Roundtable on Information Technology. The Aspen Institute. Washington. DC.
Bosse. Bernadette. (2015). Electronic vs. Digital data. On: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/electronic-vs-digital-data-bernadette-bosse
Burson-Marsteller. (2018. December 4). World Leaders on Instagram. Geneva. On: https://twiplomacy.com/blog/world-leaders-instagram-2018/
Danda. Steven James. (2014). An Evaluation of Cyber Diplomacy Against The Threat of Cyber Crime: The Cace Of The US PRISM Programme Leak. Master Thesis. Department of Political And Administrative Studies. Faculity of Social Studies Univercity of Zimbabwe.
de Keulenaar. Emillie V. & Melissen. Jan. (2018. November 11). Critical Digital Diplomacy and How Theory Can Inform Practice. in: : Volker Stanzel (Ed.). New Realities in Foreign Affairs: Diplomacy in the 21st Century. SWP Research Paper. Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik: German Institute for International and Security Affairs. Berlin-Germany. on: https://www.swp-berlin.org/fileadmin/contents/products/research_papers/2018RP11_sze.pdf
Deos. Anthony S. Digital Diplomacy & Social Capital: Analysing Relational Components of Trust in US & Israeli Online Social Networks. University of Otago. Otago. On: https://ourarchive.otago.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10523/5800/DeosAnthonyS2015PhD.pdf?sequence=1
Diplo Foundation. (2015). “What is e-diplomacy anyway?” on: http://www.diplomacy.edu/blog/what-e-diplomacy-anyway.
Dizard. Wilson. (2001, Summer). Digital Diplomacy US foreign policy in the information , International Journal. (56). 3. 552.on: https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40203598.pdf?refreqid=excelsior%3A547ebe6e9fcf45bdd137d625121ef80b
Grincheva. Natalia. (2013. March). Cultural Diplomacy 2.0: Challenges and Opportunities in Museum International Practices. museum and society. University of Leicester. Vol 11. No 1. 39-49 on: https://journals.le.ac.uk/ojs1/index.php/mas/article/view/221/234
Hanson. Fergus. (2012. March) Revolution @State: The Spread of Ediplomacy. Lowy Institute for International Policy. Sydney. On: https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/03_ediplomacy_hanson.pdf
Hocking. Brian. & Melissen. Jan. (2015). Diplomacy in the Digital Age. Clingendael Report. Netherlands Institute of International Relations Clingendael. The Netherlands.
Hocking. Brian. (2005). Rethinking the ‘New’ Public Diplomacy. In: Jan Melissen (Editor). The New Public Diplomacy: Soft Power in International Relations. PALGRAVE MACMILLAN. New York.
Hoffmann. Helen. (2013). Twitter as an Instrument of Public Diplomacy: A Case Study of Sweden and Germany. Master of Arts Thesis Euroculture. University of Göttingen. University of Uppsala. June 30. on: http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:653015/FULLTEXT01.pdf
https://blogs.aljazeera.net/blogs/2017/3/8/%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AF%D8%A8%D9%84%D9%88%D9%85%D8%A7%D8%B3%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B1%D9%82%D9%85%D9%8A%D8%A9
Ilan Manor & Elad Segev & Ronit Kampf. Digital Diplomacy 2.0? A cross-national comparison of public engagement in Facebook and Twitter. the Hague Journal of Diplomacy. Volume 10. Issue 4. 2015. on: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283259027
Ilan Manor. The Digitalization of Diplomacy: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Terminology. DigDiploROx Working Paper No. 2. Oxford Digital Diplomacy Research Group. University of Oxford (Jan 2018). p.3. Available from: http://www.qeh.ox.ac.uk/sites/www.odid.ox.ac.uk/files/DigDiploROxWP2.pdf
Ilan Manor. What is Digital Diplomacy. and how is it Practiced around the World? A brief introduction. The 2016 Annual Review of the Diplomatist Magazine http://www.diplomatist.com/dipoannual2016/index.html?pageNumber=36
International Telecommunication Union. (2018). Measuring the Information Society Report. Volume 1. Geneva. Switzerland. On: https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/publications/misr2018/MISR-2018-Vol-1-E.pdf
Kurbalija. Jovan. (2013). E-Diplomacy and Diplomatic Law in the Internet Era. in: Katharina Ziolkowski (ed.). Peacetime Regime for State Activities in Cyberspace. International Law. International Relations and Diplomacy. NATO CCD COE Publication. Tallinn- Estonia.
Lüfkens. Matthias. (2016). Twiplomacy Study. Burson-Marsteller. Geneva. June 2016. On: https://twiplomacy.com/blog/twiplomacy-study-2016/
Lüfkens. Matthias. (2018). Twiplomacy Study 2018. Burson-Marsteller. Geneva. July 2018. On: https://twiplomacy.com/blog/twiplomacy-study-2018/
Martin. Todd. (2001). Virtual Diplomacy. E-merge – A student Journal of International Affairs. Volume 2. on: http://www.diplomatonline.com/pdf_files/npsia/volume%202%20archive%20(2001).pdf#page=5
Melissen. Jan. (2005). The New Public Diplomacy: Between Theory and Practice. In: Jan Melissen (Editor). The New Public Diplomacy: Soft Power in International Relations. PALGRAVE MACMILLAN. New York.
Momengoh. Nick Parfait. (2013) Secret Diplomacy: The Practice of Back Channel Diplomacy by Liberal Democratic States. A Dissertation submitted to the Graduate School-Newark Rutgers. The State University of New Jersey In partial fulfillment of the equirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Global Affairs. Newark. New Jersey.
Nicolson. Harold. (1942). Diplomacy. Oxford Uniersity Press. London.
Nye. Joseph S. (2018). Is Cyber the Perfect Weapon? On: https://www.belfercenter.org/publication/cyber-perfect-weapon
Pierinmi. Gabriele. (2016/2017). Cyber security meets diplomacy: the EU-NATO cooperation and the Italian case. LUISS. Department of Political Science. Master's Degree in International Relations – Global Studies. Chair of Security Studies. Academic Year.
Pierre. Pahlavi. (2003). Cyber-Diplomacy: A New Strategy of Influence. Paper presented to the Canadian Political Science Association General Meeting 2003. Halifax. Nova Scotia.
Saddiki. Said. (2006). Diplomacy in a Changing World. Alternatives; Turkish Journal of International Relations. Vol.5. No.4. on: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227344613
Senya. Delali Anne Peace. (2016). The Benefits and Challenges Of Electronic Diplomacy (E-Diplomacy) To Developing Countries: The Cace of Ghana. Master Thesis. The University of Ghana. Legon. On: http://dapalan.com/16Kz
Sharp. Paul. (1999). For Diplomacy: Representation and the Study of International Relations. International Studies Review. Vol. 1. No. 1. on: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3186365
Sharp. Paul. (2009) Diplomatic Theory of International Relations. Cambridge University Press. New York.
Stein. Janice Gross. (2011. Winter 12). Diplomacy in The Digital Age. Essays in Honour of Ambassador. International Journal. Vol. 67. No. 1. 255-260
Tiirmaa-Klaar. Heli. (2013) Cyber Diplomacy: Agenda. Challenges and Mission. in: Katharina Ziolkowski (ed.). Peacetime Regime for State Activities in Cyberspace. International Law. International Relations and Diplomacy. (pp.509-531). NATO CCD COE Publication. Tallinn- Estonia.
Wihlborg. Elin. & Norstedt. Anna. (2017). New ways and actors when diplomacy goes digital: The e-Diplomacy Campaign “Midwives4All. Part of: Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. (pp.2438-2447). University of Hawaii. on: http://liu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1134243/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Zhang. Juyan. (2011). China’s Faith Diplomacy: Initiatives and Vulnerabilities. in: Essays on Faith Diplomacy. Naomi Leight (Ed.). (pp.47-66) Figueroa Press. Los Angeles.
Published
2019-04-11
How to Cite
SALIH BARZNJI, Dana Ali. Electronic diplomacy: A study of the nature, requirements, and implications. Journal of University of Human Development, [S.l.], v. 5, n. 2, p. 20-36, apr. 2019. ISSN 2411-7765. Available at: <http://journals.uhd.edu.iq/index.php/juhd/article/view/312>. Date accessed: 21 sep. 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.21928/juhd.v5n2y2019.pp20-36.
Section
Articles