The Role of Metaphor in Advertisement Texts: A Psycholinguistic-Structural Study

Authors

  • Raafat Nazar Al-Heety Department of English, College of Education for Humanities, University of Anbar,Ramadi, Anbar, Iraq
  • Huda Abdulhakeem Hussein Department of English - Al-Ma’amoon University College,Baghdad, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21928/juhd.v5n3y2019.pp14-17

Keywords:

garden path, metaphor, relational metaphor, sentential metaphor

Abstract

This paper investigates the role and usage of metaphor in advertising texts from a psycho-linguistic, structural perspective. It adopts Al- Najjar (1984) structural classification of metaphor to go hand in hand with Frazier's (1987) perceptual theory of garden path of comprehension on the side of the advertisees. The analysis traces the impact of employing metaphorical texts in texting adverts. It discusses how, linguistically, unrelated words are connected together in terms of cognitive process (garden path). Indirect targeting of meaning by manipulating linguistic tools like structural options generates one of the most attractive factors for a text which is vagueness. Hovering around the exact wording of some meaning provides the advertiser enough space to insert multi-meanings, concepts, and ideas. As such, different unique impact can be made on the advertisees. The paper analyses some selected English advertising texts depending on an eclectic model made out of these two models. Finally, it ends with some conclusions which assure that relational metaphor is comprehended serially, while sentential metaphor is comprehended in a parallel garden path.

References

Al-Najjar, M. F. (1984). Translation as a correlative of meaning cultural and linguistic transfer between Arabic and Engish. Indiana University. Bloomington.

Boyed, N. (2016). Persuasive advertising: Connotations& associations. Retrieved in July 2/2016 from www.thought co. com.

Croft. W, Cruse. A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge university press.

Fodor. J, Frazier. L, Merrill Garrett, Panel. G, Jacques. M. (2015). Panel Discussion: Sentence perception and sentence production.

Frazier, L. (1987). Sentence Processing: A tutorial review. In Colthheart (ed), Attention and performance 12: The psychology of reading (P.P 559-586). Hillsdale, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Frazier. L, Jr, Charles. C. (1996). Construal. Cambridge: Massachusetts, London: England.
Gibbs, R.W.( 1994). The poetics of the mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge: University press.

Hussein, R.M. (2009). ). Perceiving English language in internet & DSR advertising: A Case of conversational implicature. Journal of Humanities. University of Anbar. (Vol. 3, No. 1 March, 2009).

Ortony, A (ed). (1993). Metaphor and thought. Cambridge. Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge. The Pitt Building, Trumpington street. 2ed edition.

O'Shaughnessy, John & O'Shaughnessy, Nicholas J (2004). Persuasion in advertising. Routledge, New York

Skinner, B.F.(2014). Verbal Behavior. Cambridge. Massachusetts.

https:\\www.Wikipedia.com.gardenpaththeory.

https:\\www.urbandictionary.com\define.php?term=save20%the 20%whales

Published

2019-07-04

How to Cite

Al-Heety, R. N., & Hussein, H. A. (2019). The Role of Metaphor in Advertisement Texts: A Psycholinguistic-Structural Study. Journal of University of Human Development, 5(3), 14–17. https://doi.org/10.21928/juhd.v5n3y2019.pp14-17

Issue

Section

Conference Paper