The Role of Internal and External Individual Difference Factors in Bilingual Development: Exploring Highly Proficient Kurdish-English Bilinguals’ Perceptions

Authors

  • Ismael Rafaat Faraj Language and Culture Center, University of Sulaimani, Sulaimani, Kurdistan Region-Iraq
  • Twana Saadi Hamid Department of English, College of Languages, University of Sulaimani, Sulaimani, Kurdistan Region-Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21928/juhd.v9n3y2023.pp124-130

Keywords:

bilingual development, internal and external factors, morphosyntactic skill, lexical skill, highly proficient Kurdish-English bilingual adolescents

Abstract

Drawing on qualitative research, the present study examines the characteristics of seven highly proficient Kurdish-English bilingual adolescents and their perceptions of the role of individual difference factors in bilingual development. Adopting a deductive thematic analysis approach, the collected data from semi-structured interviews were analyzed. The findings indicate that special attention should be paid to both internal and external factors in order for Kurdish-English bilinguals to reach high level of proficiency in both languages. External factors of richness of input, input quantity, language output, and socioeconomic status are crucial for fostering morphosyntactic and lexical skills in Kurdish and English. Moreover, the bilingual learners stated that conducting mathematical and logical problem-solving activities frequently and having high level of language learning aptitude are important predictors of rapid development of bilingual language abilities. In terms of age effects, the bilingual adolescents conveyed that having younger age and earlier start to Kurdish and English learning always lead to better morphosyntactic and lexical outcomes in both languages. To the best of our knowledge, the current study is the first to explore the role of individual difference factors in bilingual development among highly proficient Kurdish-English bilinguals. The paper highlights implications and directions for further research.

References

Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., Klein, R., & Viswanathan, M. (2004). Bilingualism, aging, and cognitive control: Evidence from the Simon task. Psychology and Aging, 19(2), 290–303. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.19.2.290

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology,3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Chondrogianni, V., & Marinis, T. (2011). Differential effects of internal and external factors on the development of vocabulary, morphology and complex syntax in successive bilingual children. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1(3), 223–248. https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.1.3.05cho

DeKeyser, R. M. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 499–533. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44486933

Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Dörnyei, Z., & Skehan, P. (2003). Individual differences in second language learning. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 589–630). Oxford: Blackwell.

Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R. (2004). Individual differences in second language learning. In A. Davies & C. Elder (Eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 525-551). Oxford: Blackwell.

García Mayo, M. P., & García Lecumberri, M. L. (2003). Age and the acquisition of English as a foreign language. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Ghafor, O., Mustafa, G., & Ahmad, H. (2019). Edutainment tendencies among EFL learners at the University of HalabjaDepartment of English Language. Journal of University of Human Development (JUHD), 5(3), 65-72.

Harley, B. (1998). The outcomes of early and later language learning. In M. Med (Ed.), Critical issues in early second language learning (pp. 26–31). Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman-Addison Wesley.

Hoff, E. (2006). How social contexts support and shape language development. Developmental Review, 26, 55–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2005.11.002

Huang, B. H., Chang, Y.-H. S., Zhi, M., & Niu, L. (2020). The effect of input on bilingual adolescents’ long-term language outcomes in a foreign language instruction context. International Journal of Bilingualism, 24(1), 8–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006918768311

Jia, G., & Aaronson, D. (2003). A longitudinal study of Chinese children and adolescents learning English in the United States. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(1), 131-161. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716403000079

King, K., & Fogle, L. (2006). Raising Bilingual Children: Common Parental Concerns and Current Research. CALdigest.

Klein, D., Mok, K., Chen, J., & Watkins, K. (2013). Age of language learning shapes brain structure: A cortical thickness study of bilingual and monolingual individuals. Brain & Language, 131, 20-24. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2013.05.014

Kuo, L.-J., Ku, Y.-M., Chen, Z., & Gezer, M. Ü. (2020). The relationship between input and literacy and metalinguistic development: A study with Chinese-English bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism, 24(1), 26–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006918768312

Meara, P., & Milton, J. (2003). X-Lex. The Swansea levels test. Newbury: Express Publishing.

Muñoz, C. (2008). Symmetries and asymmetries of age effects in naturalistic and instructed L2 learning. Applied Linguistics, 24(4), 578–596. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm056

Newman, A., Tremblay, A., Nichols E., Neville H., & Ullman M. (2012). The influence of language proficiency on lexical semantic processing in native and late learners of English. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 24(5), 1205–1223. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00143

Pakulak E, & Neville, H. (2010). Proficiency differences in syntactic processing of monolingual native speakers indexed by event-related potentials. journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22 (12), 2728–2744. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21393

Paradis, J. (2011). Individual differences in child English second language acquisition: Comparing child-internal and child-external factors. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1, 213–237. https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.1.3.01par

Paradis, J., Soto-Corominas, A., Chen, X., & Gottardo, A. (2020). How language environment, age, and cognitive capacity support the bilingual development of Syrian refugee children recently arrived in Canada. Applied Psycholinguistics, 41(6), 1255-1281. https://doi.org/10.1017/S014271642000017X

Paradis, J., Soto-Corominas, A., Daskalaki, E., Chen, X., Gottardo, A. (2021). Morphosyntactic development in first generation Arabic-English children: The effect of cognitive, age, and input factors over time and across languages. Languages, 6(51). https://doi.org/10.3390/languages6010051

Pfenninger, S., & Singleton, D. (2018). Starting age overshadowed: The primacy of differential environmental and family support effects on second language attainment in an instructional context. Language Learning, 69(S1), 207-234. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12318

Pfenninger, S., & Lendl, J. (2017). Transitional woes: On the impact of L2 input continuity from primary to secondary school. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 7, 443-469. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2017.7.3.5

Pham, G., & Tipton, T. (2018). Internal and external factors that support children’s minority first language and English. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 49, 595–606.

Schmid, M. S., & Karayayla, T. (2020). The roles of age, attitude, and use in first language development and attrition of Turkish–English bilinguals. Language Learning, 70(Suppl 1), 54–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12361

Singleton, D. (1995). A critical look at the critical period hypothesis in second language acquisition research. In D. Singleton & Z. Lengyel (Eds), The age factor in second language acquisition (pp.1-29). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Snodgrass, J.G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174-215.

Sun, H., Steinkrauss, R., Tendeiro, J., & de Bot, K. (2016). Individual differences in very young children's English acquisition in China: Internal and external factors. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19, pp 550-566. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728915000243

Unsworth, S., Brouwer, S., De Bree, E., & Verhagen, J. (2019). Predicting bilingual preschoolers’ patterns of language development: Degree of non-native input matters. Applied Psycholinguistics, 40(5), 1189-1219. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716419000225

Wray, A. H., & Weber-Fox, C. (2013). Specific aspects of cognitive and language proficiency account for variability in neural indices of semantic and syntactic processing in children. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 149–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2013.03.002

Xue, J., Hu, X., Yan, R., Wang, H., Chen, X, & Li., M (2021). Onset age of language acquisition effects in a foreign language context: Evidence from Chinese–English bilingual children. Journal of Psycholinguist Research, 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-019 09637-y

Published

2023-07-30

How to Cite

Faraj, I. R., & Hamid, T. S. (2023). The Role of Internal and External Individual Difference Factors in Bilingual Development: Exploring Highly Proficient Kurdish-English Bilinguals’ Perceptions. Journal of University of Human Development, 9(3), 124–130. https://doi.org/10.21928/juhd.v9n3y2023.pp124-130

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)