The Need for a Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Approach in Kurdistan Education System
Content and language integrated learning (CLIL) approach has become a much debated feature of the education system in recent years. The study reported here examines the role of CLIL within the context of the Kurdistan Educational System. In particular, it investigates CLIL implementation in Kurdistan’s schools and its impact on the acquisition of the English language, contents of main subjects at the individual level, students and teachers, and the whole educational system. The study does not examine the impact of CLIL within the Kurdish education system, but a possible role for it. In order to do this, it first reviews the existing theoretical viewpoints on CLIL and its significance in language learning through the study of content of other subjects. A framework is then developed to describe the current situation of the Kurdistan Educational System and review CLIL in a different context. Data is obtained mainly through questionnaires to teachers and students in the Kurdistan Educational System and semi-structured interviews with two Spanish students who had experience in CLIL. All collected perceptions are analysed and implications for the usefulness of CLIL for Kurdistan Education System, teachers’ and students’ perspective on implementing CLIL in Kurdistan’s school and how CLIL be implemented in Kurdistan. Data from the study suggests that studying the content of some of the main subjects in Kurdistan’s schools provides more opportunity to expand intellectual horizons of students while improving their English language skills and knowledge. Owing to these reasons, integrating learning language and content from early age in schools will impact the entire education and higher education systems in Kurdistan. This is the first study to investigate the role of CLIL in the Kurdish context and further longitudinal studies are required to improve our understanding of the implications of the wider introduction, role, and advantages of implementing CLIL in Kurdistan and how to incorporate CLIL into Kurdish education policy.
 BYRNES, H. (2008). Assessing content and language. E. Shohamy (Ed.), volume 7: Language testing and assessment. New York: Springer, pp. 37-52.
 COYLE, D., 2007. Content and language integrated learning: Towards a connected research agenda for CLIL pedagogies. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), pp. 543-562.
 COYLE, D., HOLMES, B. and KING, L., 2009. Towards an integrated curriculum: CLIL national statement and guidelines. London: The Languages Company.
 COYLE, D., HOOD, P. and MARSH, D., 2010. CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge: Ernst Klett Sprachen.
 DALMA, J., 2013. Team-teaching a type of cooperation between native and non-native teachers in Hungarian Primary CLIL programmes. In: ÁRVA, V., MÁRKUS, É, ed, Education and/und Forschung. Budapest: ELTE TÓK Tudományos Közlemények XXXV, pp. 60-77.
 DALTON-PUFFER, C., NIKULA, T. and SMIT, U., 2010. Charting policies, premises and research on content and language integrated learning. In: C. DALTON-PUFFER, T. NIKULA and U. SMIT, eds, Language Use and Language Learning in CLIL Classrooms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, pp. 1-19.
 DELLER, S. and PRICE, C., 2007. Teaching Other Subjects Through English. Oxford: Oxford University Press Oxford.
 DORNYEI, Z., 2001. Motivational Strategies in the Language Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
 FÜRSTENBERG, U. and KLETZENBAUER, P., 2012. CLIL: from Online Sources to Learning Resources. ICT for Language Learning, .
 GAJO, L., 2007. Linguistic knowledge and Subject knowledge: how does bilingualism contribute to subject develompent? International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), pp. 563-581.
 GREENFELL, M., ed, 2002. Modern Languages across the curriculum. London: Routledge.
 HARROP, E., 2012. Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): limitations and possibilities. Encuentro, 21, pp. 57-70.
 JUKIL, A.M., 2009. The policy of educational system in Iraq-Kurdistan. Erbil: Salahaddin University.
 KRAMSCH, C., 2006. Culture in Language Teaching. In: H.L. ANDERSEN, K. LUND and K. RISAGER, eds, Culture in Language Learning. Lancaster: Aarhus university press, pp. 11-25.
 LASAGABASTER, D., 2009. Language attitudes in CLIL and traditional EFL classes. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(2), pp. 4-16.
 LEE, J.S. and JEONG, E., 2013. Korean–English dual language immersion: perspectives of students, parents and teachers. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 26(1), pp. 89-107.
 LLINARES, A., MORTON, T. and WHITTAKER, R., 2012. The Roles of Language in CLIL. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
 MARSH, D., 2012. Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) A Development Trajectory. Córdoba: University of Córdoba.
 MARSH, D., 2000. An introduction to CLIL for parents and young people. In: D. MARSH and G. LANGÉ, eds, Using Languages to Learn and Learning to Use Languages. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä, .
 MARSH, D. and LANGÉ, G., 2000. Using languages to learn and learning to use languages. Finland: University of Jyväskylä.
 MARTINEZ, S.H., 2013. CLIL: The application of this innovative educational approach in different European countries, Universidad de Oviedo.
 MEHISTO, P., FRIGOLS, M.J. and MARSH, D., 2008. Uncovering CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning and Multilingual Education. Oxford: Macmillan.
 SHARIF, T., 2013. Importing Educational Services from Finland to Kurdistan. Helsinki: Haaga-Helia University of Applied Sciences.