Blended Learning Mobility Approach and English Language Learning

Abstract

Although the benefits of blended learning have been well documented in educational research, relatively few studies have examined blended mobilities in education in Kurdistan region government and in Iraq. This study discusses a blended mobility approach for a teacher training program designed for in-service English language teachers (ELT) and investigates its effectiveness by comparing the latest participation of the University of Human Development for computer science and proposing the same program for training English for lecturers and students. The research involved proposes new mobility program for teaching and learning English language and using their language skills in an ongoing business project using several software for communication and management of their projects. Results will show the framework for new blended learning and blended mobilities of many different English language teaching (ELT) aspects.

References

[1] F. Rizvi. “Global mobility, transnationalism and challenges for education”. Transnational Perspectives on Democracy, Citizenship, Human Rights and Peace Education, Bloomsbury Academic, London, p. 27, 2019.
[2] H. Du, Z. Yu, F. Yi, Z. Wang, Q. Han and B. Guo. “Group Mobility Classification and Structure Recognition using Mobile Devices”. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom). IEEE, Sydney, pp. 1-9, 2016.
[3] M. T. Batardière, M. Giralt, C. Jeanneau, F. Le-Baron-Earle and V. O’Regan. “Promoting intercultural awareness among European university students via pre-mobility virtual exchanges”. Journal of Virtual Exchange, vol. 2, pp.1-6, 2019.
[4] A. Baroni, M. Dooly, P. G. García, S. Guth, M. Hauck, F. Helm, T. Lewis, A. Mueller-Hartmann, R. O’Dowd, B. Rienties and J. Rogaten. “Evaluating the impact of virtual exchange on initial teacher education: A European policy experiment”. Researchpublishing. net, Voillans, France, 2019.
[5] T. Andersen, A. Jain, N. Salzman, D. Winiecki and C. Siebert. “The Hatchery: An Agile and Effective Curricular Innovation for Transforming Undergraduate Education”. In: Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2019.
[6] J. O’Donnell and L. Fortune. “Mobility as the teacher: Experience based learning. In: The Study of Food, Tourism, Hospitality and Events”. Springer, Singapore, pp. 121-132, 2019.
[7] C. J. Bonk and C. R. Graham. “The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs”. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, 2012.
[8] J. MacDonald. “Blended Learning and Online Tutoring: A Good Practice Guide”. Gower, UK, 2006.
[9] I. Falconer and A. Littlejohn. “Designing for blended learning, sharing and reuse”. Journal of Further and Higher Education, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 41-52, 2007.
[10] M. I. Ghareb and S. A. Mohammed. “The effect of e-learning and the role of new technology at university of human development”. International Journal of Multidisciplinary and Current Research, vol. 4, pp. 299-307, 2016.
[11] M. I. Ghareb and S. A. Mohammed. “The role of e-learning in producing independent students with critical thinking”. International Journal of Engineering and Computer Science, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 15287, 2016.
[12] P. Neumeier. “A closer look at blended learning parameters for designing a blended learning environment for language teaching and learning”. ReCALL, vol. 17, no. 2, pp.163-178, 2005.
[13] D. Dozier. “Interactivity, Social Constructivism, and Satisfaction with Distance Learning Among Infantry Soldiers”. (Doctoral
Dissertation), 2004.
[14] M. I. Ghareb, S. H. Karim, Z. A. Ahmed and J. Kakbra. “Understanding student’s learning and e-learning style before university enrollment: A case study in five high schools/sulaimani-KRG”. Kurdistan Journal of Applied Research, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 161-166, 2017.
[15] M. I. Ghareb and S. A. Mohammed. “The future of technology based classroom”. UHD Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 27-32, 2017.
[16] F. Mortera-Gutiérrez. “Faculty best practices using blended learning in e-learning and face-to-face instruction”. International Journal on E-learning, vol. 5, no. 3, pp.313-337, 2006.
[17] M. I. Ghareb, Z. A. Ahmed and A. A. Ameen. “The role of learning through social network in higher education in KRG”.
International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 20-27, 2018.
[18] M. P. Menchaca and T. A. Bekele. “Learner and instructor identified success factors in distance education”. Distance education, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 231-252, 2008.
[19] S. Wichadee. “Facilitating students’ learning with hybrid instruction: A comparison among four learning styles”. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 99-116, 2013.
[20] J. A. Lencastre and C. P. Coutinho. Blended learning. In: “Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology”. 3rd ed. IGI Global, Hershey PA, pp. 1360-1368, 2015.
[21] M. Macedo-Rouet, M. Ney, S. Charles and G. Lallich-Boidin. “Students’ performance and satisfaction with Web vs. paper-based
practice quizzes and lecture notes”. Computers and Education, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 375-384, 2009.
[22] D. Neubersch, H. Held and A. Otto. “Operationalizing climate targets under learning: An application of cost-risk analysis”. Climatic Change, vol. 126, no. (3-4), pp. 305-318, 2014.
[23] N. Deutsch and N. Deutsch. “Instructor Experiences with Implementing Technology in Blended Learning Courses”.
ProQuest, UMI Dissertation Publishing, 2010.
[24] P. Mitchell and P. Forer. “Blended learning: The perceptions of first-year geography students”. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 77-89, 2010.
[25] R. B. Marks, S. D. Sibley and J. B. Arbaugh. “A structural equation model of predictors for effective online learning”. Journal of
Management Education, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 531-563, 2005.
[26] C. W. Holsapple and A. L. Post. “Defining, assessing, and promoting e learning success: An information systems perspective”. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 67-85, 2006.
[27] C. Greenhow, B. Robelia and J. E. Hughes. “Learning, teaching, and scholarship in a digital age: Web 2.0 and classroom research:
What path should we take now”? Educational Researcher, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 246-259, 2009.
[28] M. V. López-Pérez, M. C. Pérez-López and L. Rodríguez-Ariza. “Blended learning in higher education: Students’ perceptions and
their relation to outcomes”. Computers and Education, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 818-826, 2011.
[29] B. H. Khan, editor. “Managing e-learning: Design, Delivery, Implementation, and Evaluation”. IGI Global, Hershey PA, 2005.
[30] B. Wächter and S. Wuttig. “Student Mobility in European Programmes”. EURODATA: Student Mobility in European Higher
Education, pp.162-181, 2006.
[31] B. Schreurs, S. Verjans and W. Van Petegem. “Towards Sustainable Virtual Mobility in Higher Education Institutions”. In: EADTU Annual Conference, 2006.
[32] H. De Wit. “Global: Internationalization of Higher Education: Nine Misconceptions”. In: Understanding Higher Education
Internationalization. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam, pp. 9-12. 2017.
[33] K. Thompson, R. Jowallah and T. B. Cavanagh. “Solve the Big Problems: Leading Through Strategic Innovation in Blended
Teaching and Learning”. In: Technology Leadership for Innovation in Higher Education. IGI Global, Hershey PA, pp. 26-48, 2019.
[34] S. Adam. “Learning Outcomes Current Developments in Europe: Update on the Issues and Applications of Learning Outcomes
Associated with the Bologna Process”. In: Presented to the Bologna Seminar: Learning Outcomes Based Higher Education:
The Scottish Experience, Edinburgh: Scottish Government, 2008.
Published
2019-06-20
How to Cite
GHAREB, Mazen Ismaeel; MOHAMMED, Saman Ali. Blended Learning Mobility Approach and English Language Learning. UHD Journal of Science and Technology, [S.l.], v. 3, n. 2, p. 1-9, june 2019. ISSN 2521-4217. Available at: <http://journals.uhd.edu.iq/index.php/uhdjst/article/view/382>. Date accessed: 14 nov. 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.21928/uhdjst.v3n2y2019.pp1-9.
Section
Articles